As a pioneer of urban SUVs, the Toyota Harrier boasts a high level of popularity thanks to its sophisticated design and premium ride. The current model (released in June 2020) has garnered support from many drivers thanks to its urban aesthetic and comfortable ride. The Harrier is scheduled to undergo a minor change on June 11, 2025 , and be reborn as a later model. In addition to the gasoline model, the lineup also includes a hybrid model boasting excellent fuel efficiency and quietness , meeting a wide range of needs. While its versatility, comfortable for both city driving and long drives, is appealing, when considering a purchase, many are concerned about its size and performance compared to rivals. This article explores the Harrier’s positioning and appeal by thoroughly comparing its size and performance with the Toyota RAV4, as well as potential rivals such as the Mazda CX-5 (including diesel) and Lexus NX.
Toyota New Harrier Size and Performance Summary
- Harrier vs RAV4
- The Harrier is long and low, while the RAV4 is short and tall. They have different characters.
- The hybrid system is the same (THS II), but the Harrier tends to have a slight advantage in fuel economy.
- The RAV4 has a larger cargo capacity.
- Harrier vs Mazda CX-5
- The Harrier is longer and more coupe-like, while the CX-5 has a more SUV-like form.
- The CX-5 does not have a hybrid version, but a torquey diesel model is available. The Harrier Hybrid has the advantage in terms of fuel economy.
- The minimum turning radius is the same, but the CX-5 has higher ground clearance.
- Harrier vs Lexus NX
- Although they share the same platform, the Harrier is longer in overall length.
- The hybrid system is also the same, but the NX is also available as a higher-output PHEV (NX450h+).
- The NX ranks highly in terms of price range, brand image, and interior and exterior quality.
- Features of the Harrier
- Sleek, coupe-like exterior design.
- High-quality interior with a focus on tactile feel.
- The hybrid model is particularly quiet, offering smooth acceleration and excellent fuel economy.
- Equipped with the advanced safe driving support system “Toyota Safety Sense.”
- It combines maneuverability in urban areas with stability at high speeds.
- The Harrier is recommended for these people!
- Those who appreciate the sophisticated design of urban SUVs
- Those who value high-quality interiors and a comfortable ride
- Those looking for excellent fuel economy and quiet driving (especially hybrids)
- Those who mainly use it for city driving or highway driving
- Those who seek advanced safety features and comfortable equipment
- Those seeking a good balance between individuality and practicality
Harrier vs RAV4: Toyota SUV showdown! Size, character, and hybrid differences
Harrier vs RAV4: Toyota SUV Showdown! [Gasoline Model Comparison]
RAV4 Adventure“OFFROAD package
First, let’s compare the gasoline models of the Harrier and RAV4, both mid-size SUVs from Toyota . While they share the same platform, their designs and characters are very different.
Basic spec comparison (gasoline)
| item | RAV4 (Adventure, gasoline 4WD) | Harrier (G Gasoline 2WD) | Differences with RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| full length | 4,610mm | 4,740mm | +130mm |
| Overall width | 1,865mm | 1,855mm | -10mm |
| Overall height | 1,690mm | 1,660mm | -30mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm | 2,690mm | – |
| engine | Inline 4-cylinder 2.0L | Inline 4-cylinder 2.0L | – |
| Maximum power | 126kW (171ps) / 6,600rpm | 126kW (171ps) / 6,600rpm | – |
| Maximum torque | 207Nm (21.1kgm) / 4,800rpm | 207Nm (21.1kgm) / 4,800rpm | – |
| Drive system | 4WD | 2WD (4WD option available) | – |
| WLTC mode fuel economy | 15.2km/L | 15.4km/L | +0.2km/L |
| Vehicle weight | 1,630 kg | 1,570 kg | -60kg |
| Minimum turning radius | 5.7m | 5.5 m (18 inches) | -0.2m |
| minimum ground clearance | 200mm | 190mm | -10mm |
| Luggage space capacity | 580L | 409L (including under deck) | -171L |
| Price (comparison grade) | 3,684,000 yen | 3,529,000 yen | -155,000 yen |
*Prices and specifications are compared based on representative grades and may vary depending on model year and options. Please check the official website for the latest information.
Body size and character
Comparing gasoline models, the Harrier is 130mm longer and 30mm lower than the RAV4, and is characterized by a long, coupe-like silhouette. On the other hand, the RAV4 is shorter and taller, giving it a powerful and active impression befitting an SUV. The RAV4 also has a higher ground clearance (200mm vs. 190mm), and is designed with off-road performance in mind. The Harrier’s character can be said to be more on-road oriented, with a focus on driving in urban areas. The Harrier’s minimum turning radius is smaller, giving it an advantage in maneuvering around town.
Interior space and luggage space
Although the wheelbase is the same, the Harrier prioritizes design, so while the rear headroom feels a little tight, the interior feels high quality and offers a high-quality space. The RAV4 has a more square body shape, so there is more interior space, especially in the rear seats and luggage compartment. The RAV4’s luggage capacity is 580L, which is best in its class, while the Harrier’s is 409L, so there is a difference due to the emphasis on design. If loading capacity is important, the RAV4 has the advantage.
Harrier vs RAV4: Toyota SUV Showdown! [Hybrid Model Comparison]
Next, let’s compare the hybrid models of both cars . Although they share the same system, there are differences in fuel economy and price.
Ash gray metallic/cyan metallic
Basic spec comparison (hybrid)
| item | RAV4 (HYBRID G/E-Four) |
Harrier (HYBRID G・E-Four) |
Differences with RAV4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| full length | 4,600mm | 4,740mm | +140mm |
| Overall width | 1,855mm | 1,855mm | – |
| Overall height | 1,685mm | 1,660mm | -25mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm | 2,690mm | – |
| engine | Inline 4-cylinder 2.5L + motor | Inline 4-cylinder 2.5L + motor | – |
| System maximum output | 163kW (222ps) | 163kW (222ps) | – |
| WLTC mode fuel economy | 20.3km/L | 21.6km/L | +1.3km/L |
| Drive system | E-Four (electric 4WD) | E-Four (electric 4WD) | – |
| Vehicle weight | 1,700kg | 1,710 kg | +10kg |
| Minimum turning radius | 5.5m | 5.7m (19 inches) | +0.2m |
| minimum ground clearance | 190mm | 190mm | – |
| Luggage space capacity | 580L (542L when lower deck is used) | 409L (including under deck) | -171L(or -133L) |
| Price (comparison grade) | 4,304,000 yen | 4,439,000 yen | +135,000 yen |
*Prices and specifications are compared based on representative grades and may vary depending on model year and options. Please check the official website for the latest information.
Fuel economy and driving performance
Both hybrid models are equipped with the THS II system based on a 2.5L engine, and both have the same maximum system output of 163kW (222ps) (compared to the E-Four). However, in WLTC mode fuel economy, the Harrier achieves 21.6km/L , beating the RAV4’s 20.3km/L . This is likely due to the Harrier’s superior aerodynamic performance, among other factors. If fuel economy is your top priority, the Harrier has the advantage. In terms of driving feel, both vehicles boast the quietness and smooth acceleration that only a hybrid can offer, but there will likely be some differences in ride quality due to differences in vehicle weight and body shape.
E-Four and Price
Both models are equipped with the “E-Four” electric 4WD system, which uses a motor to drive the rear wheels. Precise drive force control contributes to stable driving on slippery surfaces and smooth starts and acceleration. Both hybrid models have a ground clearance of 190mm (lower than the RAV4 gasoline Adventure). Comparing the G-grade E-Four models with similar equipment levels, the Harrier Hybrid is priced at approximately 130,000 yen more than the RAV4 Hybrid. Differences in fuel economy and price, as well as differences in design and cargo capacity, must be taken into consideration when making your selection. Please check the official website for the latest information.
Reference Toyota RAV4 Toyota Harrier
Harrier vs Mazda CX-5: A showdown between popular mid-size SUVs! No hybrids…
The Mazda CX-5 is popular for its stylish design. While the CX-5 does not have a hybrid model , it does have a clean diesel engine option, which offers excellent fuel economy. Here we compare the Harrier Hybrid and the CX-5 Diesel.
CX-5
Basic spec comparison (Harrier HV vs CX-5 Diesel)
| Specifications | Mazda CX-5 (XD Proactive, 4WD) | Harrier (HYBRID G・E-Four) | Difference from CX-5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| full length | 4,575mm | 4,740mm | +165mm |
| Overall width | 1,845mm | 1,855mm | +10mm |
| Overall height | 1,690mm | 1,660mm | -30mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm | 2,690mm | -10mm |
| engine | Inline 4-cylinder 2.2L diesel turbo | Inline 4-cylinder 2.5L + motor | – |
| Maximum power | 147kW (200ps) / 4,000rpm | 163kW (222ps) (system) | – |
| Maximum torque | 450Nm (45.9kgm) / 2,000rpm | – (Reference: Engine 177ps/22.5kgm) | – |
| WLTC mode fuel economy | 16.6km/L | 21.6km/L | +5.0km/L |
| Drive system | 4WD | E-Four | – |
| Vehicle weight | 1,710 kg | 1,710 kg | – |
| Minimum turning radius | 5.5m | 5.7m (19 inches) | +0.2m |
| minimum ground clearance | 210mm | 190mm | -20mm |
| Luggage space capacity | 505L (including sub-trunk) | 409L (including under deck) | -96L |
| Price (comparison grade) | 3,657,500 yen | 4,439,000 yen | +781,500 yen |
*Prices and specifications are compared based on representative grades and may vary depending on model year and options. Please check the official website for the latest information.
Differences in fuel economy and driving feel
In terms of fuel economy, the Harrier Hybrid (21.6km/L) significantly outperforms the CX-5 Diesel (16.6km/L). The Harrier Hybrid is attractive for those who want to keep fuel costs down and prioritize environmental performance. Meanwhile, in terms of driving feel, the CX-5 Diesel’s impressive 450Nm of torque generated from low rpm is appealing. If you’re looking for powerful acceleration and a relaxed ride, the diesel is also a compelling choice. The Harrier Hybrid is characterized by smooth, quiet acceleration thanks to its motor assist. In terms of price, the CX-5 Diesel is priced lower than the Harrier Hybrid. We recommend taking a test drive to compare the two powertrains to see which one best suits your usage and preferences.
Reference Mazda CX-5 Toyota Harrier
Harrier vs Lexus NX: Premium SUV showdown! What’s the difference between the hybrids?
The popular Lexus SUV, the NX, is a sister car to the Harrier, sharing a platform, but there are differences in hybrid systems and brand value.
Lexus NX
Basic spec comparison (hybrid)
| Specifications | Lexus NX (NX350h version L/AWD) | Harrier (HYBRID Z “Leather Package” E-Four) | Difference from NX |
|---|---|---|---|
| full length | 4,660mm | 4,740mm | +80mm |
| Overall width | 1,865mm | 1,855mm | -10mm |
| Overall height | 1,660mm | 1,660mm | – |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm | 2,690mm | – |
| engine | Inline 4-cylinder 2.5L + motor | Inline 4-cylinder 2.5L + motor | – |
| System maximum output | 179kW (243ps) | 163kW (222ps) | -16kW (-21ps) |
| WLTC mode fuel economy | 20.9km/L | 21.6km/L | +0.7km/L |
| Drive system | AWD (electric) | E-Four (electric) | – |
| Vehicle weight | 1,810 kg | 1,750 kg | -60kg |
| Minimum turning radius | 5.8m | 5.7m | -0.1m |
| minimum ground clearance | 185mm | 190mm | +5mm |
| Luggage space capacity | 520L (including underfloor space) | 409L (including under deck) | -111L |
| Price (comparison grade) | 6,350,000 yen | 5,148,000 yen | -1,202,000 yen |
*Prices and specifications are compared based on representative grades and may vary depending on model year and options. Please check the official website for the latest information.
Hybrid systems and brand value
The Harrier Hybrid and NX350h share a 2.5L hybrid system (THS II), but the NX350h has a higher maximum system output (243hp vs. 222hp) , allowing for more powerful acceleration. However, fuel economy is slightly better for the Harrier (21.6km/L) than the NX350h (20.9km/L) . This is likely due to differences in vehicle weight (the Harrier is lighter). Additionally, the NX is also available as a plug-in hybrid model (NX450h+), which uses a more powerful motor for EV driving and even higher power output. Naturally, as a Lexus brand, the NX surpasses the Harrier in terms of interior and exterior materials and design, quietness, and a wide range of advanced features, resulting in a correspondingly higher price. If cost performance is important, the Harrier is the choice, while the NX is the choice for those seeking a more premium experience.
Reference LEXUS NX Toyota Harrier
Who is the Harrier recommended for?
The Harrier is the perfect SUV for those seeking a balance of sophisticated urban design , high-quality interior space , and a comfortable ride . The hybrid model in particular makes everyday travel more comfortable and economical with its quietness, smooth driving feel, and excellent fuel efficiency.
As can be seen from the comparison, the overall length is longer than its rivals, but it features a coupe form with a low overall height. The ground clearance is also high enough to be used in urban areas, and the emphasis is on on-road comfort and quietness rather than off-road performance.
Specifically, it is recommended for the following people:
- Those who like sophisticated, coupe-like SUV designs
- Those who value a high-quality interior space, such as quality and quietness
- Those looking for excellent fuel economy and a quiet, smooth driving feel (especially hybrids)
- Those who mainly drive around town or on highways and want a comfortable ride
- Those who want to enhance their driving safety support systems and comfortable equipment
- Those who want to drive an elegant car while being conscious of environmental performance
- Those who do not often have to ride with many passengers or carry large luggage
Both the gasoline and hybrid versions of the Harrier will be attractive choices that will enrich and elegantly color your everyday life.
A word from the editorial department
As a pioneer of urban SUVs, the Harrier has always offered cutting-edge design and comfort. The current model inherits that DNA and exudes a presence that sets it apart from its rivals. The hybrid model in particular balances fuel economy, quietness, and driving performance at a high level , making it a powertrain that can be recommended to many people. In addition to comparing the size, the comparison of hybrid performance has made the Harrier’s unique position and appeal clearer. We encourage you to experience the real car and its high-quality worldview for yourself.
